Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Director Stan Boling related that in July 2007, the Board directed staff to <br />revisit Ordinance 2007-001, concerning amendments to the Land Development Regulations <br />(LDRs), Chapter 910, that govern concurrency vesting. Through his memorandum and a <br />PowerPoint presentation, Director Boling discussed the regulations governing concurrency <br />vesting and explained why amendments to Chapter 910 were necessary. <br />Director Boling reviewed the two draft Ordinances, Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, <br />which were up for Board approval. Alternative 1 would modify concurrency vesting allowances <br />for all types of development, and Alternative 2 would change vesting allowances for targeted uses <br />only. He advised the Board that the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC), Planning <br />& Zoning (P&Z), and staff had all recommended adoption of Alternative 1. <br />item. <br />The Board offered comments and posed questions to Director Boling regarding this <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br />The following speakers spoke in favor of Amendment 1: <br />Joseph Paladin, Black Swan Consulting, and David Ederer. <br />Bob Johnson, Vero Beach, posed questions about school concurrency, and learned <br />from Community Development Director Bob Keating that no County financial responsibility <br />would occur because of school concurrency. <br />Detailed discussion ensued between the Commissioners, Director Keating, and <br />Administrator Baird regarding impact fees as related to school concurrency, and Director Keating <br />December 11, 2007 14 <br />