My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2007 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
12/11/2007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 4:33:03 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:29:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4015
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
11110
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Helen Furet, 9586 Doubloon Drive, explained that the permitting she had received <br />from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) was granted in order to preserve the <br />existing structure. She was now working with MVB Engineering to see if the house should be torn <br />down and rebuilt, or whether some existing walls could be salvaged. <br />Mr. Akins addressed Vice Chairman Davis's question as to why the DEP was <br />involved, and commented that the Furets had been in the same position with the engineer a year <br />ago, and they had not moved ahead with any plans. <br />Mrs. Furet disagreed with Mr. Akins' assessment and informed the Board that prior <br />to getting the seawall this year, the Furets had been unable to proceed. Her fear was that if the DEP <br />found out the structure was going to be demolished, the Furets would be unable to get renewed <br />permitting to rebuild, since the permitting for the seawall was granted as an armory for the house. <br />She reiterated that within a couple of months the engineers would be doing a full inspection of the <br />structure, and she hoped that they could work out some type of plan to save some of the walls, so <br />the Furets won't have to request further DEP approval. <br />The Board urged her to expedite the evaluation process by the engineers. <br />The Commissioners and Mr. Akins assured Mrs. Furet that they wanted to work <br />with her and also to satisfy her neighbors; they would rather see her rebuild the house than have it <br />torn down. They explained that even if the demolition was approved, the County would not move <br />ahead until: (1) Mrs. Furets' engineer had gotten back with the Building Department, and (2) <br />approval for the award for the demolition contract had been brought to the Board. <br />Chairman Bowden suggested that a 60 -day extension be given to the Furets. <br />December 11, 2007 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.