My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
1/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:57:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />a <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THE COUNTY'S EXPENSE SIMPLY WOULD <br />BE THE PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATIONS AND ARRANGING FOR THE PAYROLL <br />DEDUCTIONS. HE DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY SHOULD APPEAR AS A SPONSOR OF <br />THIS PROGRAM, BUT SIMPLY MAKE IT AVAILABLE. <br />MR. NELSON STATED THAT THE PROGRAM CAN ONLY BE OFFERED IF THE <br />COMMISSION ENDORSES IT. HE CONTINUED THAT FRINGE FACTS, INC. ADMINISTERS <br />THE PROGRAM AND THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT WOULD JUST PUT IT ON THEIR PAYROLL <br />DEDUCTION PROGRAM. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO MAKE AVAILABLE TO COUNTY <br />EMPLOYEES THE DENTAL PLANS PROVIDED BY FRINGE�FACTS, INC., AND ARRANGE <br />FOR THE PAYROLL DEDUCTION FOR THOSE PEOPLE INTERESTED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEWED THE RESOLUTION KNOWN AS THE "MITCHELL <br />BUILDERS, INC., OF MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA WATER FRANCHISE," AND DISCUSSED <br />CHANGES MADE TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS WE HAVE BEEN USING. HE RECOM- <br />MENDED THAT IF THE BOARD FINDS THE BASIC FORMAT IN ORDER, THEY APPROVE <br />IT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: <br />PAGE 3, SECTION VI: ATTORNEY COLLI'NS STATED THAT HE IS USING <br />STANDARDS SET BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH BECAUSE THE COUNTY HAS NONE OF <br />THEIR OWN AT THE PRESENT TIME. HE NOTED THE CITY HAS ADDITIONAL REQUIRE- <br />MENTS ABOUT BACKFILLING. HE FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD NOT REQUIRE THIS, <br />BUT RELY ON.THE ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE PROPER <br />SUPERVISION AS YET, THE ATTORNEY FURTHER NOTED THAT THE MATERIALS TO <br />BE USED WILL MEET STANDARDS SET BY THE CITY SO THAT WHEN THE SYSTEMS TIE <br />TOGETHER IN THE FUTURE THEY WILL BE COMPATIBLE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY'S STANDARDS - <br />COULD BE REVISED, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THE PHRASE "OR AS'AMENDED" <br />SHOULD BE ADDED AFTER "1977" ON THE THIRTEENTH LINE OF SECTION VI. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED THE POSSIBLE NEED FOR AN EASEMENT <br />TO GO ON THE PROPERTY TO HOOK UP WHERE ALL THE WATER LINES COME TOGETHER <br />AT THE PLANT. <br />ON PAGE 4, SECTION VII, ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED WHAT <br />QUALITY STANDARDS TO REQUIRE. HE NOTED WE HAVE NOT MADE ANY OF OUR OWN <br />AND WILL, THEREFORE, RELY ON THOSE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL <br />REGULATION. <br />21 <br />8 PAcE461 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.