Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Mr. Minner confirmed that understanding as correct. <br />Discussions continued regarding adding language in the Agreement, to <br />have five-year extension periods. <br />Mayor Adams, commenting on the issue of USAC review for Exhibits D, <br />E & F, questioned whether, for Vero Beach that would not preclude the necessity for <br />having exhibits D, E & F. She noted that there are exceptions to the ISBA, and asked <br />why they would need to be reviewed. <br />Mr. Vitunac thought their Planners' point was if a project in the WEC, say <br />for Sebastian, does not have a comprehensive land use change or future land use, it might <br />not come to USAC. He said this is just to make sure that what happens in the WEC <br />happens without a USAC review. <br />Mayor Adams asked if that was not why it was called out as an exception <br />and an Exhibit. <br />Mr. McGarry said those were just principles in the Exhibit, and the <br />example he used was a New Town under the County's ordinance. He explained that <br />Comprehensive Plans set the principles but the actual New Town goes through a zoning <br />process to be placed there and that is when you get the specifics on the development. He <br />did not see a problem of reviewing it, as they would for other land use changes. <br />Mayor Adams said Fellsmere would have a problem with anything falling <br />under Exhibit `F', and then having to come to USAC for review, pointing out that was <br />why they have an Exhibit `F'. <br />20 <br />December 15, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />