My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2003 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
12/16/2003 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 11:36:03 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2574
Book and Page
126, 269-329
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
agriculture is important in this county. He wondered if it is a healthy decision for so many people <br />to be living next to producing agricultural land. He suggested they may want to consider a <br />moratorium. Some sort of transition from agriculture to the urban service area is needed. The <br />direction we are taking is not a transition. <br />Commissioner Ginn was concerned spraying by airplanes serving the citrus groves will <br />affect the development. <br />Gary Wheeler, 3302 63rd Square, feels growth is inevitable. People have the right to <br />develop, and we have the right to decide how it is to be developed. He believes it is time to <br />reevaluate our route to determine the destination we want. He hoped the Board would sit down <br />and take a hard look at impact fees, additional east/west thoroughfares, our comprehensive land <br />use plan, and our urban service area. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought major errors have been made; we should have stopped growth <br />at Interstate 95. At the Taxpayers Meeting, the Superintendent of Schools said over the last three <br />years they have 1500 more students. In Port St. Lucie, they have issued permits for 5200 homes <br />this past year, and she feels if we are not careful we could have the same situation here. The Board <br />is going to examine impact fees and she asked if they need to enact a pending ordinance until the <br />study is completed. <br />Attorney Collins counseled the Board to clarify the revisions that they want made to the <br />Comprehensive Plan, then all applications can be held pending the public hearing. He believed <br />they were suggesting a moratorium on all development or the development around the I-95 node. <br />They would have to advertise and hold a public hearing to get public input in order to adopt a <br />moratorium to study impact fees or revise the Comprehensive Plan. Attorney Collins's opined a <br />moratorium would probably take 9 to 12 months which could shut down a significant segment of <br />the economy that the board is trying hard to stimulate. <br />Commissioner Ginn commented we do have a lot of small manufacturing businesses <br />tucked away and we do not need to change our level of service. <br />DECEMBER 16, 2003 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.