My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2003 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
12/16/2003 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 11:36:03 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2574
Book and Page
126, 269-329
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously, directing staff to initiate a formal LDR <br />amendment for a west county industrial park height exception <br />and to increase the proposed setbacks from State Road 60 and <br />I-95 as discussed. <br />11.B.1 PURCHASE OF A ONE-YEAR 800 MHz SOFTWARE LICENSE <br />FROM COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously approved <br />the purchase of a one-year 800 MHz software license <br />agreement from Communications International, Inc. in the <br />amount of $74,000, as recommended by staff in their <br />memorandum dated December 4, 2003. <br />11.C. STEALTH CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AT <br />SOUTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANT - SBA <br />General Services Director Tom Frame said SBA is a local company who proposed a <br />camouflaged flagpole with a flag that actually is a communications tower to be erected at the South <br />County Reverse Osmosis Plant (photo is on file). They have established a minimum criteria and <br />pointed out this calls for a co -share of 50% on all the co -locates on the tower. In this proposal they <br />are requesting 50% of the revenue that the primary telecommunications company would receive <br />from the co -locates. The masonry wall is an item that they would negotiate and is optional and at <br />this particular tower it may not be necessary. <br />There was a brief discussion regarding co -locates. <br />DECEMBER 16, 2003 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.