Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman Flescher, to approve Section <br />#6. <br />Attorney Ferguson felt that the provision in Section #6, Item (3)(a), to tap the <br />entire security amount each time maintenance work is performed, was a bit unreasonable. <br />Rather, the security should pay for actual costs incurred. <br />After further analysis by staff, Commissioners, and Attorney Ferguson regarding <br />the security requirements for road maintenance, Attorney Collins suggested adding the following <br />language to Section #6, Item (3)(a) of the Ordinance: The unexpended balance of the security <br />would be returned to the mining owner/operator or applied to the newly posted security. <br />MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Solari, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman Flescher, to approve Section <br />#6, with the addition to Item (6)(3)(a) of the following <br />verbiage: The unexpended balance of the security would be <br />returned to the mining owner/operator or applied to the newly <br />posted security. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 4-0 <br />vote (Chairman Davis recused himself), the Motion carried <br />unanimously. The Board approved, with the above <br />amendment, Section #6. <br />Director Boling next presented the highlights of Section #7, Items (1)(a) through <br />(1)(d), regarding Compliance and Enforcement. He provided details regarding the Progressive <br />27 <br />December 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Mining Regulations <br />