Laserfiche WebLink
compliance, road maintenance, restoration), as appropriate, and terminate the project mining <br />permit..." This would allow the forfeiture of security to be tied to a specific violation. <br />Attorney Ferguson maintained that there is a potential problem for mixing up a <br />penalty provision with the forfeiture of security. He believed the security must be tied to the <br />actual expenses. <br />Chairman Davis asked if time should be spent re -working this section of the <br />Ordinance, and Attorney Collins voiced that he did not want to leave penalty provisions out of <br />the Ordinance. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan suggested that Section 7(c)(4) be amended, beginning <br />with verbiage on the fourth line, as follows: "...the Board of County Commissioners is <br />authorized to ' , <br />^ster-a4 en) and ton,. inane the pr-qjeet miningor.nit as e ^'*,, terminate the proiect mining <br />permit as a penalty, and to impose forfeiture of all posted securitv if needed. <br />Attorney Collins felt that Commissioner O'Bryan's suggestion was good, and <br />stated that staff could work with Mr. Ferguson if there were some issues on the penalties. <br />MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner O'Bryan, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wheeler, to approve Section <br />#7, with the following amendment to Item 7(c)(4): "...the <br />Board of County Commissioners is authorized tope�e <br />for-feiftre—af all p , <br />mainten-arree, r-estar-avian) and tetininato the pra*t m4ling <br />pias -alb to terminate the Droiect mining permit as <br />30 <br />December 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Mining Regulations <br />