Laserfiche WebLink
Further discussion ensued among Commissioners, staff, and area residents <br />regarding the intentions for having the littoral zones; enforcement of littoral zone regulations; <br />time parameter for initiation of the requirements; and whether trees should be planted in the <br />littoral zones. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan felt that the slope for a planted littoral zone could be 1-6; <br />however, if the littoral zone was not going to be planted, there should be a provision for having <br />the 1-10 slope. <br />Director Boling commented that whatever the degree of the slope, stabilization <br />would have to be done at restoration. Chief of Environmental Planning Roland DeBlois added <br />that the 1-10 slope would not be in conflict with SJRMWD's 1-6 threshold for the littoral zones. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Vice Chairman Flescher, by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner Solari <br />opposed; Chairman Davis recused himself), the Board <br />approved under Section #4(2)(c)(1) that the slope for the <br />planted littoral zone shall be no steeper than one (1) foot <br />vertical to ten (10) feet horizontal. <br />Director Boling asked if Commissioner Wheeler's Motion included approval of <br />Section #4, Item (2)(d)(6), for mining projects that proposed agricultural use as part of the site <br />restoration, to not require the littoral zone plantings until the site has been converted to a non- <br />agricultural use, and was advised by Attorney Collins that the Motion only included the slope. <br />7 <br />December 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Mining Regulations <br />