My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/02/2008
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
12/02/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2018 3:30:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:19:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/02/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4023
Book and Page
136, 215-269
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7262
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
purpose; and in 1938 the State of Florida ruled that to do that, you need a two-thirds vote of the <br />Legislature. <br />Commissioner Wheeler indicated that this item should not have been placed under <br />the Consent Agenda since it is a controversial item; and the letters Attorney Block sent to the <br />County should have been placed in the Backup for further clarification. <br />Attorney Block read the letters that were sent to the Community Development <br />Department into the record. <br />Chairman Davis felt this issue puts the government against private property rights; <br />that it is not a safety issue but a property rights issue; and that it is outside his realm of expertise. <br />Attorney Block discussed the County's 13 foot assist; the allowance of 30 feet for <br />proper ingress and egress; and Carter Associates' 1994 survey where witness points were used. <br />Attorney Collins acknowledged that he had not responded to Attorney Block's <br />letters because of the legal issues regarding maintenance. He had checked with the Road and <br />Bridge Division to determine if they had maintained it for the required seven years, and found out <br />they had maintained it for 15 years. He thereafter referenced page 124 of the Backup, and raised a <br />fact issue as to whether the road maintenance only reflected on the database, or if the County <br />actually maintained it. <br />County Administrator Baird suggested bringing this item back to the Board after <br />meeting with the property owners. He revealed that the County is trying to protect the future rights <br />of the road, and felt the argument was with the width of the road (Old Dixie). <br />12 <br />December 2, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.