My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
2/21/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:00:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR.'FAIR FELT THEY MIGHT HAVE TO ADJUST THE CENTER LINE, AFTER FIELD <br />INSPECTIONS. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THEY ARE BOUND BY EVERYTHING THAT <br />-THEY SAY HERE TODAY AND WHAT IS IN THEIR APPLICATION - THEY ARE GOING <br />TO LIVE BY IT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF THE BLUE MAPS ARE TO BE MADE A PART <br />OF THE RECORD AND MR. FAIR STATED THEY COULD BE REDUCED AS AN EXHIBIT <br />IF HE DESIRED. • <br />MR. FAIR THEN READ RECOMMENDATION #2 FROM THE ASSESSMENT REPORT <br />OF THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. <br />ATTORNEY SMITH QUESTIONED WHETHER THE BOARD WILL HAVE A CHANCE <br />TO REVIEW THE CHANGES OR ARE THEY GIVING FINAL APPROVAL NOW AND DEPARTING <br />OF LOCAL CONTROL TO RELY SOLELY ON THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. <br />MR. FAIR STATED THAT THEY ARE SEEKING APPROVAL BY AND FROM THE <br />COUNTY SUBJECT TO WHATEVER CONDITIONS THE COUNTY WISHES TO IMPOSE. HE <br />CONTINUED THAT IF THERE ARE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS, THEY WOULD GO BACK <br />FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW BUT THIS DOES NOT AFFECT THE RIGHTS OR RESPONSI- <br />BILITIES OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FROM ALSO LOOKING AT IT TO DETERMINE IF <br />THERE IS A DEVIATION. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THERE IS A DEVIATION OF <br />MORE THAN 1000, IT MAY REQUIRE FULL REVIEW OF THE BOARD. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF IT WAS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO MONITOR <br />THIS PROJECT TO SEE WHETHER IT DEVIATES TOO MUCH. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INTERJECTED THAT IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO <br />PUt THEM ON NOTICE AND CALL FOR A HEARING. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD <br />SHOULD REVIEW WHAT HAS RECENTLY BEEN SUBMITTED AND PERHAPS GIVE COUNSEL <br />AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW IT PRIOR TO FINAL DETERMINATION. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED WHETHER OR NOT IT WOULD BE BETTER FOR THE <br />BOARD TO WAIT FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TO FINISH WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY <br />REGARDING DIFFERENT ROUTES. <br />MR. FAIR STATED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET THROUGH THE PROCESS <br />AND START THE BUILDING OF THE LINES AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME <br />INDICATION FROM THE BOARD WITHOUT HAVING IT CONTINGENT ON WHAT IS <br />HAPPENING ELSEWHERE. HE FURTHER COMMENTED THAT IF EACH COUNTY MADE <br />THEIR DETERMINATION CONTINGENT ON ANOTHER COUNTY; THEY WOULD BE GOING <br />AROUND IN CIRCLES. <br />33 <br />s 9 pAcE <br />FEB -2 11979 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.