Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THIS IS NOT A THROUGH STREET <br />GOING EAST AND WEST - IT STOPS AT U.S. 1. SHE FURTHER SUGGESTED THAT <br />THIS MATTER BE PUT ON HOLD AT THIS TIME. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR SVELSON CONCLUDED BY STATING THAT THE <br />COUNTY CAN REEVALUATE IT ONCE DOT WIDENS IT AND PUTS IN A CENTER LANE <br />AT THE INTERSECTION OF 8TH STREET AND U.S. 1. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NEIL NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ON <br />,THE 15TH OF FEBRUARY, THE ADMINISTRATOR AND HE MET WITH REPRESENTATIVES <br />OF CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY TO REVIEW THEIR INITIAL PROPOSAL FOR THEIR <br />SERVICES FOR DESIGN OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE OLD HOSPITAL BUILDING, THE <br />COURTHOUSE AND THE ANNEX. AT THAT TIME CHANGES WERE RECOMMENDED, AND <br />CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY SUBMITTED A SECOND COST PROPOSAL, WHICH THE <br />ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF AND HERCULES KONTOULAS, CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRE- <br />SENTATIVE, HAVE REVIEWED; AND ARE NOW PRESENTING A COUNTER PROPOSAL FOR <br />THE BOARDS CONSIDERATION. - <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON THEN PROCEEDED TO REVIEW THEIR <br />COUNTER PROPOSAL AND STATED THAT THEY AGREE WITH THE FIRST PAGE AND THEY <br />ALSO AGREE WITH ARTICLE 15.1, THE PROVISION IN REGARD TO "AS BUILT DRAW- <br />INGS" OF EXISTING FACILITIES. HE NOTED THAT THESE ARE NECESSARY BECAUSE <br />THE HOSPITAL BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS; THE ANNEX <br />WAS BUILT SOME YEARS AGO; AND THE COURTHOUSE WAS ADDED TO ON A NUMBER OF <br />OCCASIONS. WE HAVE SUPPLIED THE CONSULTANTS WITH ALL THE CONSTRUCTION <br />PLANS OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES THAT WE HAVE,BUT THERE IS NO ASSURANCE <br />THAT WHAT IS IN THOSE PLANS ARE CORRECT. THE CONSULTANT MUST GUARANTY <br />THAT THE "AS BUILT PLANS ARE CORRECT; SO,THEY WILL HAVE TO MAKE ADDI- <br />TIONAL PLANS OR MODIFY THE ONES WE SUPPLY TO THEM. <br />CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT <br />THE ARCHITECTS WILL REDRAW THE EXISTING BUILDING AND WILL HAVE TO VERIFY <br />THE THINGS THAT ARE IN DOUBT BY INVESTIGATION. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR <br />NELSON FELT THAT THIS WILL REQUIRE EXTENSIVE WORK. <br />THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED.THE BOARD THAT THE ARCHI- <br />TECTS PROPOSED TO PROVIDE SERVICES BASED ON A LUMP $UK FEE OF $317,375. <br />FEB 21: 1979 <br />53 <br />BOOK 39 PACE 134 <br />BOOK 39 PACE 134 <br />