My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
2/21/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:00:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IF YOU LOOK AT THE CONSTRUCTION <br />PHASE ON PAGE 9, IT INDICATES THAT THEY ARE ALLOCATING AT MOST 20%, AND <br />MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT 2% OF THE 8.5% IS NORMAL. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT 2 MAN VISITS A MONTH HARDLY SEEMS <br />WORTH THAT AMOUNT. <br />MR. KONTOULAS NOTED THAT THERE WILL BE STAGNANT PERIODS OF <br />CONSTRUCTION, AND POINTED OUT IF THIS WERE NOT SPECIFIED, IT WOULD BE <br />LEFT TO THE CONSULTANTS' DISCRETION. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHAT "2 MAN VISITS A MONTH" ACTUALLY <br />MEANS. MR. KONTOULAS WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THE ARCHITECT'S INTENTION <br />IS TO SEND 2 MEN ON EACH VISIT, OR, IN OTHER WORDS, 2 MEN ONCE A MONTH, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT IT SAYS THAT 1 MAN WILL COME UP TWICE A <br />MONTH. HE FELT CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION WILL BE REQUIRED, AND MR. KONTOULAS <br />NOTED THAT HE WILL BE THERE. THE CHAIRMAN POINTED OUT THAT MR. KONTOULAS <br />IS PAID BY THE COUNTY. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS QUOTED FROM ARTICLE 1.5.4 WHICH SAYS THE <br />ARCHITECT SHALL VISIT THE SITE AT INTERVALS ... BECOME FAMILIAR WITH <br />PROGRESS ... DETERMINE IF WORK IS PROCEEDING ACCORDING TO CONTRACT DOCU- <br />MENTS ... KEEP OWNER INFORMED OF THE PROGRESS ... GUARD THE OWNER AGAINST <br />DEFECTS AND DEFICIENCIES ... HE FELT WE ARE, IN EFFECT, PAYING FOR THE <br />WARRANTY AFFORDED BY THIS, AND THAT -THEY ARE SAYING THEY TAKE THE RESPON- <br />SIBILITY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT IS TRUE, BUT POINTED OUT THAT <br />ALTHOUGH THEY HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUPERVISION, IF THEY DON'T DO IT <br />AND SOMETHING GOES WRONG, THE COUNTY IS ULTIMATELY THE LOSER. <br />MR. KONTOULAS WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS IS COVERED UNDER THE <br />GENERAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE CONTRACT. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED PAGE 9, ARTICLE 14.2.1, <br />WHERE WE ARE REMOVING THE STIPULATED SUM OF $317,375 AND INSERTING <br />$280,910 of 8.5% OF THE LOWEST BONAFIDE BID, WHICHEVER IS LOWER. HE <br />STATED THAT HERE AGAIN HE FELT WE ARE PROTECTING OURSELVES BECAUSE IF <br />WE COME IN WITH A.LOW BID ON CONSTRUCTION, THE ARCHITECT'S FEE WILL BE <br />LOWER. <br />DRAWINGS. <br />F E B 211979 <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE AGAIN QUESTIONED THE $13,500 FOR "AS BUILT" <br />01.1 <br />M PAGE..' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.