My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/23/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
12/23/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 11:45:37 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/23/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2574
Book and Page
126, 330-350
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
523
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Williams, Smugglers Cove, congratulated the Commissioners on taking this <br />extremely important step. He hoped that somehow during the interim something can be <br />done to slow down rezoning and the growth rate. He cited Port St. Lucie as an example to <br />show that increased impact fees do not impose a burden to stop growth. <br />As a result of comments made by Mr. Williams, there was a discussion on school <br />impact fees and information that came forth at a recent meeting of the Taxpayers <br />Association. <br />Acting Administrator Baird pointed out that every county has different capital <br />needs, different revenue sources, different project demands, and different levels of service. <br />We cannot just arbitrarily impose a tax; it would not be defensible and it would get the <br />County into a lot of litigation. <br />County Attorney Collins noted that State Statute Chapter 163 actually authorizes <br />and encourages impact fees, but the case law that has developed around impact fees says <br />that you have to go through certain methodologies to determine your existing LOS and <br />whether you are operating at that level now; whether you have deficiencies, and what other <br />funds people have already paid into that you could credit against impact fees. He counseled <br />that the Board has to go through the process as Director Keating outlined. It will probably <br />take six months after a consultant is selected. The Board must make sure the number <br />selected is defensible in terms of the impact that a new unit has on each facility for which <br />they might want to set up an impact fee. Again, he explained the pending ordinance <br />requirements and suggested that if the Board wants to stem development in the meantime, <br />perhaps they could have a moratorium on rezoning. <br />Commissioner Adams did not want to see a moratorium. Perhaps a pending <br />ordinance could give a range of numbers, but we would not collect fees until the actual fees <br />are determined after the study. <br />December 23, 2003 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.