My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/6/2005 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
12/6/2005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2018 2:54:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/06/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3096
Book and Page
129, 929-1004
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
268
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Davis advised the status of the roads in that area and warned that paying <br />over $300,000 per acre for cleared pastureland would set a precedent for future land purchases. <br />The School Board had recently spent $95,000 per acre therefore $100,000 per acre for this <br />property could be justified. He asked whether the Board wanted to pay pre-development prices for <br />the land or platted lot prices. This property has not yet been platted. <br />County Administrator Baird stressed the importance of this decision regarding <br />setting a precedent for purchasing property in the future. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Neuberger, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowden, to approve staff’s <br />recommendation. (Deny the Developer’s Agreement) <br /> <br />th <br />Mark Brackett, <br /> 1915 34 Avenue, thought he had his preliminary PD (planned <br />development) approval. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating advised that both preliminary and <br />conceptual PD approval had been given. Mr. Brackett now needs a land development permit and <br />before he can get that, he needs to satisfy conditions that would be covered in the Developer’s <br />Agreement. <br />Mr. Brackett <br /> advised that the issues with Sebastian River Drainage District have <br />been resolved. He recounted the discussion when the Board gave their prior approval concerning <br />this property and the County’s possible purchase of the lots; the development of those lots was <br />contingent on the Developer’s Agreement. His original design was not changed. He had agreed to <br />not sell the lots because the County might need to buy them in the future for widening CR 510. He <br />had submitted an offer to the County to purchase the lots approximately a year ago and claimed <br />that in 8 months the County made no counter offer until about 8 weeks ago. <br />County Administrator Baird took issue with Mr. Brackett’s last statement saying <br />Mr. Brackett <br />that he had been in negotiation meetings with Mr. Brackett but held to his statement. <br />December 6, 2005 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.