My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
3/7/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/07/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF VERO BEACH HAS A $25.00 DEPOSIT. HE CONTINUED THAT WE ARE <br />JUST GETTINGA NTO THIS BUSINESS AND ARE LEARNING AND POSSIBLY, AS WE <br />BECOME LARGER AND HAVE MANY THOUSANDS OF CUSTOMERS LIKE THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH, WE CAN DO THIS MORE ECONOMICALLY. <br />ONE RESIDENT ASKED WHY THEY ARE NOT ON THE SAME FOOTING AS <br />VERO BEACH, AND NOTED THAT THEY WILL PAY A DEPOSIT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT.THEY ARE IN THE COUNTY, <br />NOT THE CITY, AND ARE NOT PAYING ANY CITY TAXES. <br />THE ARGUMENT CONTINUED AND ONE GENTLEMAN BROUGHT UP THE <br />CONSERVATION ASPECT. HE STATED IT APPARENTLY IS TO THE COUNTY'S BENEFIT <br />TO HAVE LESS WATER USAGE BECAUSE SHORTAGE OF WATER SEEMS TO BE A PROBLEM, <br />AND HE FELT THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE GAINED BY REDUCING THE TURN -ON FEE <br />SO PEOPLE WILL TURN THEIR WATER OFF, <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT WE NEED TO BRING THIS DISCUSSION <br />TO A CONCLUSION AS THE BOARD HAS MANY OTHER MATTERS TO CONSIDER. SHE <br />FELT CONSERVATION WAS ONE OF THE STRONGEST POINTS CALLED TO OUR ATTENTION. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY GOT INTO THIS BUSINESS <br />OVERNIGHT AND DOES HAVE PROBLEMS, BUT WE ARE TRYING TO RE-EVALUATE AND <br />HOPEFULLY CAN STREAMLINE THE SYSTEM AND REDUCE SOME OF THE CHARGES. AT <br />THIS TIME, HOWEVER, WE WILL JUST HAVE TO TAKE THE PEOPLE'S RECOMMENDATIONS <br />AND STUDY THEM BECAUSE WE MUST INVESTIGATE ALL,THE FIGURES. SHE•THANKED <br />THOSE PRESENT FOR BRINGING THIS PROBLEM TO THE BOARD'S ATTENTION. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT MID -FLORIDA IS OUT OF <br />BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T MAKE ENDS MEET. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NEXT DISCUSSED A REQUEST MADE BY JOHN <br />FICA REGARDING INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OF <br />6TH AVENUE AND U. S. 1. THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN <br />1974 THE DOT EVALUATED THIS SAME INTERSECTION, AND THEIR CONCLUSION WAS <br />"•` THAT THROUGH TRAFFIC ON 6TH AVENUE SHOULD BE ROUTED TO THE NORTH ONLY <br />AND THAT NO LEFT TURNS SHOULD BE PERMITTED FROM U.S. I INTO 6TH AVENUE. <br />HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE DOT HAD ALL THEIR KEY PERSONNEL UP HERE TO <br />STUDY THIS AREA BECAUSE THE LOADING AND UNLOADING OF CITRUS AT EXCHANGE <br />PACKERS ON THE HIGHWAY WAS A SERIOUS FACTOR. THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED <br />20 <br />11 som 39 PACE 175 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.