Laserfiche WebLink
OF CLOSING THE ENTRANCE; ALLOWING ONLY NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC TO EXIT ONTO <br />U.S. 1; OR FINDING A WAY TO GET ONTO U.S. 1 OTHER THAN AT THAT INTER- <br />SECTION. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT AT THIS TIME THE BOARD WILL <br />CONTINUE DISCUSSION OF THE PRESENTATION MADE BY FLORIDA POWER &•LIGHT AT <br />THE DRI HEARING HELD AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD -HAS COPIES OF A PROPOSED <br />RESOLUTION FROM FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE <br />RECEIVED AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION FROM ATTORNEY MOSS, <br />REPRESENTING FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT, AND THE ONLY CHANGE WOULD BE AN <br />ADDITION OF No. S ON THE NEXT TO LAST PAGE AS FOLLOWS: <br />H. THE APPLICANT WILL ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE LINE WITHIN THE <br />GENERAL CORRIDOR TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON GROVES LOCATED IN INDIAN <br />RIVER COUNTY. <br />THE ATTORNEY NOTED THAT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING THERE WERE TWO OBJECTORS - <br />A CITRUS GROWER AND ATTORNEY SMITH REPRESENTING DIAMOND RANCH. HE CON- <br />TINUED THAT ATTORNEY SMITH HAS WRITTEN,A LETTER SUGGESTING THAT THE <br />RESOLUTION CONTAIN A PROVISION REQUIRING THAT'THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- <br />MISSIONERS SHALL APPROVE THE FINAL ALIGNMENT AS WELL AS TREASURE COAST <br />REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE RESOLUTION <br />PRESENTLY STATES THAT IF THE BOARD INDEPENDENTLY REACHES A CONCLUSION <br />THAT THE POWER LINES DEVIATE FROM THE CORRIDOR AS REPRESENTED TO AN <br />' EXTENT GREATER THAN 1,000' OR 5%, THEN THE BOARD, ON ITS OWN VOLITION, <br />WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO MAKE A DETERMINATION IF THERE IS, IN FACT, <br />A DEVIATION, AND THEN ENTER APPROPRIATE ORDERS, ATTORNEY COLLINS DID <br />NOT FEEL THAT ATTORNEY SMITH'S SUGGESTION WOULD CREATE A HARDSHIP FOR <br />FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT, AND NOTED THAT IF THE BOARD AGREED TO THIS, THEN <br />PARAGRAPH B ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE RESOLUTION COULD BE DELETED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT THIS WAS COVERED <br />UNDER 21 BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THIS PROVISION PUTS THE <br />BURDEN ON THE COUNTY COMMISSION RATHER THAN PLACING THE BURDEN ON THE <br />APPLICANT TO SHOW THAT THEIR FINAL ALIGNMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DEVIA- <br />TION. HE FELT SUCH A PROVISION UNDER 2 WOULD CREATE A HARDSHIP ON THE <br />BOARD. <br />22 <br />BOOK 39 PAGE 1 I <br />-MAR 71979 <br />