My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
3/7/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/07/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />ABOUT THE FACT THAT WHATEVER IS ALLOCATED CAN BE UNALLOCATED LATER AND <br />TRANSFERRED. COMMISSIONER LYONS THEN BROUGHT UP THE PROBLEM OF THE <br />SEWER LINE ON 6TH AVENUE AND COMMENTED THAT THE ONLY THING THAT BOTHERS <br />HIM ABOUT THIS IS THAT WE HAVE MORE OR LESS TAKEN THE STAND THAT WHEN THE <br />TIME COMES TO MOVE THE SEWER BUSINESS TO THE.NORTH COUNTY PLANT, -THE <br />WATER BUSINESS GOES WITH IT, T00. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE WATER IN THE 6TH AVENUE <br />AREA IS STILL SUPPLEMENTED WITH MID -FLORIDA WATER. HE STATED THAT HE <br />HAS ALWAYS BEEN UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE CITY WILL NOT ACCEPT <br />SEWAGE WITHOUT THE WATER. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT THEY DID IN THE CASE OF <br />GIFFORD, BUT NOTED THAT SEWER AND WATER ARE REALLY MARRIED AS FAR AS <br />ENTERPRISES ARE CONCERNED BECAUSE IT INVOLVES THE QUESTION OF HOW YOU <br />BILL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT 6TH AVENUE IS THE ONE LOCATION <br />WHERE THE COUNTY CAN DELIVER SEWAGE DIRECTLY TO THE SEWAGE PLANT, HE <br />FELT THERE IS PROBABLY ROOM TO WORK OUT QN AGREEMENT WHERE, AT SOME POINT <br />IN TIME, ONE ENTITY OR THE OTHER WILL HAVE BOTH SEWER AND WATER. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT MEASURING SEWER EFFLUENT, AND <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED TVAT HIS QUESTION IS WILL THE CITY ACCEPT <br />SEWERAGE WITHOUT THE WATER, COMMISSIONER LYONS -DID NOT KNOW. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IN THE INDIAN RIVER SHORES <br />AREA, THE COUNTY HAS ABOUT 200 CUSTOMERS ON THE PEBBLE BAY SEWER SYSTEM, <br />ABOUT HALF OF WHOM ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN <br />AND HALF IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA, AND HE, THEREFORE, DID NOT FEEL WE <br />CAN LIMIT OURSELVES JUST TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT TO <br />THE BOARD THAT WHEN COMMISSIONER LYONS WENT TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER <br />SHORES WITH A PROPOSAL THAT WAS INTENDED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THEIR <br />PEOPLE, AND IS REALLY THE FIRST STEP OF MANY THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN TO <br />SOLVE THE PROBLEM, HIS PROPOSAL WAS REJECTED OUTRIGHT. THE PROPOSAL <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS PRESENTED WAS THAT WE WOULD ALLOCATE FOR ALL THE <br />EXISTING STRUCTURES THAT ARE THERE, PLUS SOME ADDITIONAL WHERE THEY SAW <br />GOOK 39 PAGE 224 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.