Laserfiche WebLink
applications could not be considered simultaneously. He had amended the requested Comp Plan <br />amendment to make it conditional on the PD site plan. <br />Director Keating interjected to advise the Board that there is no way possible to <br />condition the Comp Plan amendment to a PD rezoning. <br />Mr. O’Haire <br /> continued by informing the Board of the PD plan to which his client <br />has committed if the Comp Plan amendment is approved. On A1A the water and sewer mains are <br />in place and that infrastructure is going to waste. The rezoning request will have to be considered <br />separately. There would be a net reduction in density and this application is not subject to the <br />Florida Department of Community Affairs approval but is just subject to the Board’s approval and <br />he urged them to do so. There would be only 22 units total. <br />Commissioner Wheeler inquired about the densities Mr. O’Haire had talked about <br />because that was all agricultural land earlier, and Director Keating noted that densities were <br />included in the 1982 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Director Keating continued that Mr. O’Haire was completely wrong by reading <br />words and concepts into the Policies in the Comp Plan that are not there. Policy 17.1 says that the <br />County shall not approve plan amendments that increase the residential density or land use <br />intensity within the Coastal High Hazard area. He claimed that Mr. O’Haire was inventing <br />concepts such as “net density” and making the assumption that the County will get a better project <br />but there is no commitment that the applicant has to do the plan he projected. If the designation is <br />changed to L-2 and the applicant does not proceed with a PD rezoning, he would have the right to <br />come back and get a conventional zoning district such as RM-6. <br />Mr. O’Haire <br /> read into the record a portion of page 59 of the Future Land Use <br />Element having to do with hurricane evacuations. He claimed he was not wrong and was not <br />inventing things. <br />st <br />Keith Pelan <br />, Kimley Horn and Associates, 601 21 Street, advised that he had been <br />working on this for about 6 months and initially submitted a PD package with the Land Use <br />amendment request. It seemed to him that their hands are tied in attempts to get good projects. It <br />was learned during the process that the PD zoning category is not compatible with any of the land <br />December 7, 2004 <br />22 <br /> <br />