My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/08/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
12/08/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2018 10:21:49 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting Mining
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/08/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4023
Book and Page
136, 270-296
Subject
Mining Regulations LDR Chapters 911, 934 and 971
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7309
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale Simchick, 766 South Easy Street, declared that the County needed to either <br />have its own staff hydrologist or have the hydrology report sent for review to an expert of its <br />choice, with the cost being paid by the applicant. <br />The Chairman called for a recess at 8:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:36 <br />pm, with all members present. <br />Director Boling recapped the immediate issue before the Board, whether the <br />County was going to require the hydrology report and an expert review, or whether it would be <br />sufficient to have the SJRWMD permit or notice of intention to issue said permit. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner O'Bryan, to approve <br />staff's recommendation to require submission of a <br />hydrology report, and to require a hydrology report expert <br />review fee. <br />Director Keating explained the benefits of having an expert review the hydrology <br />report. He divulged that the applicant's cost for the hydrology report could, but would not <br />necessarily, cost as much as $10,000; cost would be based on the size and complexity of the <br />mining operation. <br />Vice Chairman Flescher questioned whether or not staff was utilizing SJRWMD <br />for its input. <br />Further discussion ensued among Commissioners, staff, Mr. Taub, and Mr. Adair <br />regarding SJRWMD's responsiveness to the County's requests. <br />13 <br />December 8, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.