My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/08/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
12/08/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2018 10:21:49 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting Mining
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/08/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4023
Book and Page
136, 270-296
Subject
Mining Regulations LDR Chapters 911, 934 and 971
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7309
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LDR's, and wanted to obtain past and future costs to see how these costs might impact a <br />business. He added that he was not saying a business should not absorb the costs, but that the <br />County should know what the costs are, before imposing them upon someone else. <br />No further questions or comments were made regarding the submittal <br />requirements, or the Procedural Sequence (the bottom of page 92), and Director Boling directed <br />attention to Section #4(2) Littoral Zone and Water Management. Director Boling observed that <br />there were not many changes to the existing wording. <br />Discussion arose as to how to bring about conclusion of today's meeting, as it was <br />getting late, and there were more items to review and discuss. <br />Commissioner Solari interjected that he did not wish to vote on the amendments to <br />the LDR's prior to getting information on what the economic impact would be to a business. He <br />reiterated that he wanted to see removed duplicate items on hydrology. <br />Director Boling advised that it would take some time to go through the remaining <br />LDR's, and suggested that another meeting would be necessary, with December 19th, 2008, <br />being the last date on which the Board could take action this month. <br />Mr. Kramer did not understand the purpose of the littoral zones, and questioned <br />why the County required them, when SJRWMD did not. He also asked what County department <br />would be conducting the compliance inspections. <br />Director Boling explained that there are shape requirements as well as the littoral <br />zone requirements, to affect a more natural type of appearance of the lake in terms of shape; <br />there was also some water quality and some habitat benefit, and an aesthetic benefit. <br />16 <br />December 8, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.