My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/21/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
3/21/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:03:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
m <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT COMMISSIONERS OF COUNTIES <br />TO THE SOUTH OF US FEEL THIS ENERGY CODE IS WRITTEN FOR THE NORTHERN <br />- STATES AND DOES NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SOME SPECIAL ADVANTAGES THE <br />SOUTHEAST HAS. <br />PETER ROBINSON, A DEVELOPER AND MEMBER OF THE BUILDING BOARD <br />OF ADJUSTMENT, NOTED THAT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE STATE DOES NOT GIVE <br />YOU AN OPTION AS TO ADOPTING AN ENERGY CODE; IT JUST GIVES YOU A CHOICE <br />OF EITHER THE PROPOSED CODE, THE NixBIX CODE, OR THE NATIONAL CODE <br />DEVELOPED BY HUD. HE STATED THAT, OF THESE CHOICES, THE PROPOSED CODE <br />IS THE BEST. <br />MR. CALMES AGREED AND NOTED THAT NIXBIX (THE NATIONAL CONFER- <br />ENCE OF STATES ON BUILDING STANDARDS) BREAKS ENERGY USES INTO ABOUT SIX <br />ZONES, BUT THE FLORIDA MODEL GOES ONE STEP FURTHER AND BREAKS OUR ZONE <br />INTO NINE DIFFERENT ZONES DEPENDING ON WEATHER CONDITIONS, ETC., AND, <br />THEREFORE, IT DOES ALLOW A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBILITY. MR. CALMES INFORMED <br />THE BOARD THAT HE HAS MADE QUITE A FEW CALCULATIONS AND FINDS THAT <br />INSULATION WILL HAVE TO BE ADDED TO SOME DWELLINGS. HE EXPLAINED THAT <br />THE CODE ALLOWS TRADE OFF•OF AREAS, IF, FOR INSTANCE, IT IS LESS EXPEN- <br />SIVE TO PUT INSULATION IN THE CEILING THAN IN THE WALLS. HE STATED THAT <br />HE DID SOME ESTIMATIONS ON A»10,000 SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN THE <br />SHAPE OF AN "L" WHERE THE INSIDE WAS ALL GLASS AND FOUND THE BUILDING <br />MET THE CODE WITHOUT ANY CHANGES. <br />+ CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE CODE EXEMPTS MULTI -FAMILY, AND <br />MR. CALMES STATED THAT IT DOES NOT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE CODE MIGHT MAKE IT <br />PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CONTINUE TO BUILD FLORIDA -TYPE HOMES WITH <br />TRIPLE GLASS SLIDING DOORS. <br />-MR. CALMES FELT IT WILL NOT PROHIBIT THIS, BUT IT WILL INCREASE <br />�`. COSTS SOME, ALTHOUGH IDEALLY THESE COSTS WILL BE RECOVERED BECAUSE YOU <br />ARE INSULATING THE BUILDING BETTER, <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED IF 1,500 SQ. FT, REFERS TO GARAGES, <br />UTILITY ROOMS, ETC., AND MR. CALMES STATED THAT IT DOES NOT. <br />20 <br />Bom 39 PACE 270 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.