Laserfiche WebLink
Responding to Commissioner Wheeler's query, Mr. Wells clarified that his primary <br />objective in pursuing his complaints was to bring certain structures on the subject property to <br />code, by either removing them, or in the case of the fence, by taking it down to 4 feet, which he <br />felt was consistent with code. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued during which Mr. Wells provided a detailed accounting on <br />violations which he maintained had occurred at the subject property, and staff elaborated on the <br />sections of County Code relating to the issues concerning Mr. Wells. Staff also explained <br />County policy on after -the -fact permit violations. <br />Commissioners, staff, and Mr. Wells continued to discuss the alleged violations. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan felt that staff had been consistent in its analyses that Mr. <br />Chestnut's permits are appropriate; however, the Board would have Code Enforcement look into <br />the additional propane tank for which there is no permit. He advised Mr. Wells to contact the <br />Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for violations concerning the dock or the riprap, <br />noting that the County has already notified them regarding Mr. Chestnut's failure to respond to <br />DEP's directive to relocate one of his boat lifts. <br />The Chairman called a break at 10:38 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:47 a.m., <br />with all members present. <br />10. C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS <br />10.C.1. NOTICE OF SCHED ULED PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 15 <br />2009: <br />CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE RS -6, RT -6, RM -6, <br />RM -8, AND RM -10 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE REGULATIONS <br />CHAPTER 911 <br />10 <br />December 8, 2009 <br />