My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/4/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
4/4/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:04:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN STRONG ARGUMENTS <br />PRESENTED, BUT REITERATED THAT IF THE BOARD SHOULD TAKE THE ACTION NOW <br />WITHOUT THE SPECIAL LEGISLATION IN QUESTION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY COULD <br />PROCEED WITHOUT THE GUIDANCE OF THE SPECIAL ACT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING SOONER <br />BUT NOT REACHING THE DECISION UNTIL AFTER THE SPECIAL ACT HAS BEEN <br />PASSED. HE COMMENTED TO MR. LUNDY THAT THE CHANCES OF A HOUSING AUTHORITY <br />BEING CREATED ARE MUCH BETTER AFTER'PASSAGE OF THE ACT THAN BEFORE. • <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD ACTUALLY DOES NOT <br />HAVE TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT ALL, BUT THEY HAVE ESTABLISHED THAT <br />THEY WILL. HE NOTED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING COULD BE HELD BEFORE THE <br />EFFECTIVE DATE OF .JULY 1ST, BUT HE DID NOT SEE ANY ADVANTAGE IN IT.. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AGREED IT PROBABLY WOULD NOT SAVE ANY TIME <br />AND MIGHT EVEN CREATE THE NECESSITY OF HAVING AN ADDITIONAL HEARING. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO SET 7:00 P.M. <br />TUESDAY, .JULY 17TH, FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE NEED FOR A HOUSING <br />AUTHORITY. <br />MR. LUNDY THEN•WENT ON TO DISCUSS A COLLECTOR STATION FOR THE <br />GIFFORD AREA, HE STATED THAT SEVERAL MONTHS AGO THE CIVIC LEAGUE ASKED <br />FOR A COLLECTOR STATION IN THE GIFFORD AREA. PRIOR TO THAT TIME, THEY <br />WERE IN CONTACT WITH THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR`S OFFICE AND MADE A <br />SIMILAR REQUEST. HE COMMENTED THAT THEY ARE STILL WAITING FOR A DUMPING <br />STATION, AND IT IS GETTING TO A POINT WHERE THEY ARE GETTING LITTLE HOME- <br />MADE DUMP STATIONS ALL AROUND, AND PEOPLE HAVE EVEN BEEN DUMPING AT THE <br />GIFFORD PARK. HE FELT THAT IT IS REGRETTABLE THAT SO MUCH TIME AND <br />EFFORT WAS SPENT TRYING TO DEVELOP A FINE RECREATION SITE FOR THE - <br />COMMUNITY ONLY TO HAVE PEOPLE USE IT FOR A DUMP. HE FELT IF THEY COULD <br />HAVE A DUMP STATION IN THE AREA, IT WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO GO THERE <br />RATHER THAN MAKING A DUMP OF THEIR OWN. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT MR. LUNDY DID NOT HAVE TO PROVE THE <br />NEED FOR A DUMP SITE IN GIFFORD. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT THE BOARD IS VERY MUCH AWARE OF <br />THE PROBLEM. SHE NOTED THAT THE FELLSMERE COLLECTOR STATION WAS GIVEN <br />24 <br />BOOK 39 PAGE T l o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.