My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/4/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
4/4/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:04:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. WALKER POINTED OUT THAT 23' WAS APPROVED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT IF WE NOW FIND THEY ARE 10' BELOW <br />THAT, DO WE LET THEM GO ON UNTIL OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR? HE DID NOT <br />BELIEVE $10,000 WOULD FILL UP MUCH OF THE HOLE. <br />ATTORNEY BROWN STATED THAT IF,AT ANY POINT, THEY ARE.IN <br />VIOLATION OF THE SITE PLAN, YOU CAN SUSPEND THE OPERATION. HE FELT THAT <br />MR. WALKER IS SAYING, THAT MANY TIMES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET YOUR <br />SLOPE THE WAY THE SITE PLAN CALLS FOR IT WHEN YOU ARE IN THE PROCESS <br />OF DOING THE TOTAL DIGGING, BUT WHEN YOU GO TO THE NEXT PHASE, THOSE <br />SLOPES MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHETHER, AFTER LOOKING AT THE <br />PICTURES SUBMITTED, HE COULD SAY THEY ARE EVER GOING TO GET A 3 TO I <br />SLOPE, WHICH.HE FELT WOULD REQUIRE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, <br />ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER STATED THAT HE BELIEVED MR, HYATT HAS <br />THE NEEDED FILL THERE BECAUSE HE IS FAR ENOUGH BACK, AND THAT HE COULD <br />LEVEL OFF THE SLOPE AND FIX IT. THE ONLY THING MR. WALKER COULD SEE WRONG <br />IS THAT MR. HYATT WAS GETTING BELOW THE 23' DEPTH AND APPARENTLY HE CON- <br />TINUED TO DIG. HE NOTED THAT A SLUMP HOLE IS SOMETIMES WISE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE ALREADY CONCERNED ABOUT <br />OUR AQUIFER AND THE WATER SITUATION, AND HE WOULD FEEL THAT AN OPERATOR <br />WOULD HAVE TO STOP AT THE APPROVED DEPTH. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED,IF THE ZONING BOARD ACTED UPON <br />INCORRECT INFORMATION AND THE MINUTES SPECIFICALLY REFLECT THAT, WHETHER <br />e <br />THAT APPROVEL WOULD STILL STAND. <br />ATTORNEY BROWN FELT THAT AS TO A THIRD PARTY, IT WOULD, AND <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO <br />WILL TESTIFY THAT THE ONLY REASON THEY ACTED WAS BECAUSE THEY WERE TOLD <br />r <br />IT WAS REVIEWED BY THE MINING REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND APPARENTLY IT WASNIT. <br />ATTORNEY BROWN FELT THAT IS A FAIR STATEMENT, BUT DID NOT <br />BELIEVE YOU CAN PENALIZE AN APPLICANT BECAUSE OF THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE <br />BOARD. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW FOR SURE <br />THAT THIS AREA COULD BE RESTORED AND WHETHER THERE IS ENOUGH FILL LEFT <br />FOR THIS. <br />01 <br />BooK 39 PAGE 390 <br />.APR 4 1979 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.