Laserfiche WebLink
AND EXPECTS ANOTHER FOUR CHECKS IN THE MAIL SO THEY ARE GETTING PRETTY <br />CLOSE TO 100% PARTICIPATION FOR THE ENGINEERING PART. <br />ATTORNEY COLL-INS INSTRUCTED THE FINANCE OFFICER TO ACCEPT ONLY <br />THE CHECKS FOR $200, AND NOT ANY CONDITIONAL LETTERS THAT MIGHT ACCOM- <br />PANY THEM. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND MR. WALKER WILL COMPOSE A <br />LETTER TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WHICH WILL CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br />THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND MR. BEINDORF AND ALLOCATE THEIR DEPOSITS FOR <br />PURPOSES OF ENGINEERING. THIS IS THE STATUS'OF GETTING THE WATER TO <br />THE EXISTING RESIDENCES SOUTH OF THE MOORINGS AT THIS TIME. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ED REGAN CAME BEFORE THE BOARD <br />AND NOTED THAT A LETTER HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING <br />AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHICH EFFECTIVELY SAYS WE HAVE BEEN DENIED PER- <br />MISSION TO APPLY FOR A GRANT FOR 1979. HE CONTINUED THAT OF THE 25 <br />APPLICANTS FOR THE NON -METROPOLITAN CATEGORY, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RANKED <br />TWELFTH. THERE IS AN INDICATION THAT WE WERE AFFECTED BY OUR LACK OF <br />HOUSING. MR. REGAN FELT THAT IF HUD WERE TO CONSIDER WHAT WAS HAPPENING <br />IN THE FIELD, THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT WE SHOULD HAVE RANKED HIGHER. <br />HE STATED THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HAD TAKEN THE POSITION THAT THEY WERE <br />ELIMINATING DEFICIENCIES RELATIVE TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PUBLIC <br />FACILITIES. HUD's CATEGORY OF RATING WAS THAT THE FACILITIES WERE <br />MODERATELY ADDRESSED, AND WE LOST*50 POINTS BECAUSE OF THIS. MR. REGAN <br />WAS OF THE OPINION THAT OUR FIELD SITUATION DOES NOT ADDRESS ITSELF TO <br />MODERATE CONDITIONS. HE STATED PICTURES OF GEOFFREY'S SUBDIVISION WERE <br />SUBMITTED AND NOTED WE HAVE $50,000 OF FINISHED ROADS THERE. WE ALSO <br />HAD PUT IN LINES IN ANTICIPATION OF THE COUNTY RUNNING THE MAIN SEWER <br />AND WATER SYSTEM LINE,OVER. HE NOTED THAT A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF MONEY <br />WAS SAVED BY PUTTING IN THESE LINES BEFORE THE ROADS WERE COMPLETED SO <br />THEY WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE DUG UP AGAIN. HE CONTINUED THAT THE SAME <br />THING OCCURRED WHEN WE TOOK THE POSITION THAT OUR ACTIVITIES ACTUALLY <br />RESOLVE A SERIOUS THREAT TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS. THEY <br />CONTENDED THAT OUR ACTIVITIES PARTIALLY RESOLVE THIS, AND WE AGAIN LOST <br />50 POINTS. MR.-REGAN NOTED THAT IF THE RATING COMMITTEE HAD TAKEN A <br />MORE REALISTIC VIEW, THEY WOULD HAVE CONSIDERED THE WATER SUPPLY TANKS <br />BOOK 39 PAGE 409 <br />APR 4 1979 <br />