My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/13/2007 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
02/13/2007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 2:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/13/2007
Archived Roll/Disk#
3128
Book and Page
132, 272-323
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3083
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was filed November 1, 2006, he thought they were put on notice of any appeals ongoing, and any <br />action subsequent to that would be at their own risk. <br />Douglas Vitunac, Esq., also from Collins, Brown, Caldwell, Barkett & Garavaglia, <br />Chartered, did not think that would be a problem. He stated they could show detrimental reliance <br />before November 1, 2006. He proceeded using a PowerPoint presentation covering the timeline of <br />important dates, and the timeliness of the Appeal. Their position was that the appeal was filed two <br />days late with the County. <br />Michael O'Haire, Esq., argued that his letter was filed on time. <br />Attorney Collins agreed with Attorney O'Haire that the appeal was filed timely, but <br />technically it was a deficient appeal, based on fact that it was filed without the filing fee. He <br />advised the Board not to hear the appeal. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the argument The Source was making, that it is <br />jurisdictional and the Board does not have the power to hear the appeal. <br />Chairman Wheeler felt this issue failed because people were not properly notified. <br />He said they need to change their rules to correct this deficiency, and when the grandfather clause <br />is in effect and people are notified. <br />Vice Chair Bowden wanted to know what their legal position was at this moment. <br />Craig Kobeloski, a resident who lives behind the subject property, argued the <br />unfairness to the matter of not hearing the public's input. <br />February 13, 2007 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.