My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/9/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/9/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:01:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kunde. Driver. Simpson & Associates, Inc. <br />Engineers / Architects 1 Planners I Surveyors <br />Jack G. Jennings <br />County Administrator <br />Indian River County <br />2145 - 14th Avenue <br />Veru Beach, Florida ;2960 <br />Pear Mr. Jennings: <br />April 17, 1979 <br />HE: Indian Piver ,Cuiirtty - <br />(i.undber•q Itd . , 87t.11 S L I -Co t <br />& 101st Avenue, Hobart Road) <br />I am attaching hereto a tabulation.of work performed by <br />our company on the above projects for which we would like to <br />request -add itional compensation as extra work. <br />You will recall that at the time we were: assembling they <br />information relating to these projects, there was neon ivr <br />ccrisiderable haste in that we were attempting to have com- <br />pleted plans to the: Department of Transportation on a verr•v <br />restricted schedule, which we were tula would, enable indr.atr <br />River County to utilize federal funds for construction of <br />these projects. <br />In order to meet that time scho,dule, we dove•loped out, <br />proposal hurredly and with the idea in mina of Wowing gttivk1v <br />througn the review and approv�:rl, pro�c o:�s with the Vo:partwt.ttt <br />of Transportation since our schedule simply would prr•atit. rte, <br />other course of action. <br />Subsequent to our initial submittal for I.utiiuurd <br />as you know, Ott, sc•hodule was vaso!d substantially .itd ro•n- <br />siderable work was*dreniod to be required by the• r•rviewing <br />engineers in the Dcpartnu•nt of Tranr;portotion which simply <br />was nut a part of our original proposal. <br />The specific items for which additional compensation <br />is required are: <br />1. Pavement marking and sign plans <br />The Department of 'Transportation requirements <br />for pavement marking and signing necessitated <br />the redrafting of all three projects on a Ito <br />50 scale with details of each sign and each <br />pavement.line for submittal to 'Tallahassee. In <br />bpite, of out- question at that time as to the <br />need for such plans, the Department of Trans- <br />portacion insisted they were necessary. They <br />have since that Lime concurred in our argue- <br />ment that such plans are redundant and no <br />longer* require Uiem. At the time that. •w(: <br />drafted our original proposal we had no idea <br />that such plans would be required and are <br />therefore requesting additional compensation <br />for this item. <br />BOOK 40 PAGE 209 <br />MAY 9.1979 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.