My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2009 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
02/17/2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:22:26 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2009
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4025
Book and Page
136, 802-861
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7331
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Davis asked Attorney Collins who would get thrown in jail if they <br />decided to use impact fees to fund this purchase, and then someone objects. Attorney Collins <br />said such action could invalidate the use of the impact fees. <br />Administrator Baird recommended that the Board listen to Attorney Collins, and <br />utilize the optional sales tax contingency, for which there was an available balance of $262,000, <br />as it was the safest approach. <br />Commissioner Solari said that would be his Motion, but he received no Second. <br />He was informed there was already a Motion on the floor by Commissioners Wheeler and <br />Flescher. <br />The Board continued to discuss the pros and cons of using impact fees for this <br />purpose, and Chairman Davis agreed with Commissioner Wheeler that this is an appropriate use <br />for expansion of the facility. <br />Commissioner Wheeler repeated the Motion, Seconded by Vice Chairman <br />Flescher, to use impact fee funds to purchase and install a Scoreboard at the North County <br />Aquatics Center. <br />Vice Chairman Flescher wanted to use impact fees, but felt if there was continued <br />opposition from the Legal staff, they leave it open to two funding sources (optional sales tax and <br />impact fees) so they could move forward with the Board leaving the Impact Fees as the primary <br />funding source, and that staff be directed to work with the best funding source to get this board <br />moving. <br />February 17, 2009 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.