Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTING THE HEADWALLS. AND <br />MITERING THE ENTRANCE CULVERT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS AND <br />SPECIFICATIONS AND SUBJECT TO A STATEMENT BEING INCLUDED ON THE PLAT <br />SETTING OUT THAT THE LOTS WOULD NOT BE SUBDIVIDED. <br />BEN SIMPSON'OF KUNDE-DRIVER-SIMPSON ASSOCIATES, INC., CAME <br />BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS DUE THEM BECAUSE OF <br />EXTRA WORK REQUIRED BY THE DOT. HE REVIEWED HIS LETTER OF APRIL 17TH, <br />WHICH WAS INCLUDED IN THE MINUTES OF MAY 9TH, AND COVERED ITEMS REQUIRED <br />BY THE DOT WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED IN HIS PROPOSAL. MR. SIMPSON STATED <br />THAT ALTHOUGH THEY DID NOT PROPOSE QUANTITY BOOKLETS, THESE WERE INCLUDED <br />IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT, SO THEY WILL AGREE TO DELETE $1,713.80 FROM <br />THEIR ADDITIONAL CHARGES. HE THEN EXPLAINED THAT PAVEMENT MARKING AND <br />SIGNING PLANS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THEIR PROPOSAL SINCE THAT IS USUALLY <br />DONE WHEN THE CONTRACT IS COMPLETED, THE DOT WISHED THIS INCLUDED AS <br />PART OF THE CONTRACT, AND THE REASON IT TOOK SO MANY HOURS IS BECAUSE <br />THEY HAD TO GO BACK AND REDETAIL EVERY SHEET TO A PARTICULAR CRITERIA <br />AND REDRAW EVERY INTERSECTION. MR, SIMPSON CONTINUED THAT THEY HAD BEEN <br />LED TO BELIEVE THAT ALL THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS ACTUALLY IN HAND, BUT THERE <br />WERE ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DOCUMENTS THAT HAD TO BE <br />DRAFTED TO CLEAR UP PROBLEMS WHERE A ROAD WAS DIVERTED AROUND A POND <br />AT THE ENTRANCE OF 87TH AVENUE, HE WENT ON TO DISCUSS THE NEED TO <br />DEVELOP A TURNING RADIUS ON ALL INTERSECTING STREETS AND EXPLAINED <br />FURTHER THAT IN THE ELEVENTH HOUR OF THE DESIGN, THE DOT REASSIGNED..THE <br />-PROJECTS TO ANOTHER REVIEWING ENGINEER, WHO DECIDED THEY HAD TO CHANGE <br />SOME THINGS THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN APPROVED, WHICH NECESSITATED A LOT OF <br />DESIGN CHANGES. MR. SIMPSON FURTHER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAD <br />DESIGNED HOBART ROAD AT A 40 MPH SPEED, BUT THE DOT CHANGED THIS TO <br />45 MPH, WHICH MEANT THEY HAD TO REDESIGN THE RAILROAD CROSSINGS. HE <br />POINTED OUT THAT SOME OF THE PROBLEMS WITH THEIR PROPOSAL WERE CAUSED <br />BY THE URGENCY TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THE JOB. MR. SIMPSON CONCLUDED THAT <br />HE SINCERELY BELIEVED A LEGITIMATE CHARGE TO THE COUNTY FOR THE ADDITIONAL <br />WORK DONE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THEIR PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT DOCUMENT, <br />AFTER TAKING ALL THE FACTORS INTO CONSIDERATION, INCLUDING VARIOUS <br />CREDITS, WOULD-BE A TOTAL OF $6,2.09.28. <br />2.1 <br />1 Itbl 3 �� 4 BOOK 0 PACE309 <br />