Laserfiche WebLink
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER Loy, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 79-16 GRANTING THE REQUESTED REZONING <br />TO AGRICULTURAL. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT IT IS HIS CONTENTION THAT <br />AGRICULTURE IS A HOLDING ZONE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT THIS CONSTITUTES SPOT ZONING, <br />AND DID NOT BELIEVE THAT AGRICULTURAL.ZONING SHOULD BE CHECKERBOARDED <br />ALL OVER THE PLACE. HE NOTED THAT THE BOARD JUST THE OTHER DAY PUT A <br />SQUARE OF AGRICULTURE IN THE MIDDLE OF OTHER ZONING,.AND HE FEELS WHAT <br />IS BEING DONE IS VERY INCONSISTENT. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON AGREED WITH COMMISSIONER SIEBERT THAT <br />AGRICULTURE IS A HOLDING ZONE, HE STATED THAT HE HAS VISITED THIS <br />PROPERTY; IT IS RURAL IN DEVELOPMENT; AND THERE ARE OTHER GROVES IN THIS <br />AREA, IN ADDITION, THE NEIGHBORS HAVE SIGNED A PETITION SUPPORTING THE <br />REQUESTED REZONING, AND HE} THEREFORE, WOULD SUPPORT THE MOTION. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONER LYONS <br />VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MOTION CARRIED. <br />33 <br />MAY Z 31979 <br />BOOK 40 PAGE 321 <br />