My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/23/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
m <br />INDICATION OF ANY ACCEPTANCE ON THE PUBLIC RECORDS. THEY, THEREFORE, <br />WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THESE REVOKED. HE NOTED THAT THERE MIGHT BE A TITLE <br />PROBLEM REGARDING THE PLAT)AND IF THERE IS A DEDICATED ROAD ALONG THE <br />OCEAN, IT WOULD RENDER HIS CLIENT'S PROPERTY VIRTUALLY WORTHLESS. HE <br />STATED THAT THEY ARE PETITIONING THE BOARD TO ABANDON THE PLAT OF ENOS <br />INSOFAR AS IT AFFECTS THIS ONE PARCEL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER. ATTORNEY <br />HENDERSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE DALES HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT <br />TO SELL THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO REMOVAL OF THE PLAT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THIS IS A RECORDED PLAT AND <br />IF YOU WERE TO LAY THE ROAD AND ALL OFF ;WITH THE EROSION THERE TODAY <br />AND THE WAY THE DESCRIPTION IS WRITTEN ON THE ONE ACRE PIECE AND TAKE <br />INTO CONSIDERATION THE 200' SETBACK LINES, HE BELIEVED IT WOULD BE <br />USELESS. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT THE SETBACK LINE IS ABOUT 89' <br />FROM THE EDGE OF THE VEGETATION SO THE PROPERTY IS USABLE, DEPENDING <br />UPON WHETHER THERE IS A DEDICATED ROAD. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED HOW YOU GET TO THE PROPERTY, AND <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THERE IS A 15' STRIP ACCESS ON THE NORTH SIDE. <br />THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY'250' FROM AIA. AlA WAS NOT IN EXISTENCE <br />WHEN THE PLAT WAS MADE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE ISSUE IN HIS MIND IS THAT HERE <br />IS AN OLD PLAT AND THERE IS A LEGAL ISSUE AS TO WHETHER THERE EVER HAS <br />BEEN AN ACCEPTANCE. HE FELT THE COMMISSION NEEDS TO MAKE A DECISION <br />WHETHER THERE EVER WOULD BE A NEED FOR THE ROADS THAT ARE DEDICATED FOR <br />ANY PUBLIC PURPOSE. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON NOTED THAT DEERFIELD GROVES AND ANOTHER. <br />ESTATE OWNS A GOODLY PORTION OF THIS PLAT. HE DID CONTACT THEM ABOUT <br />MAKING A JOINT EFFORT, BUT THEY ARE IN PROBATE RIGHT NOW AND NOT READY <br />TO TAKE ANY ACTION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF THE PLAT IS NOT VACATED, <br />THE TITLE WILL BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED FOR YEARS TO COME. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT WE COULDN'T PUT A ROAD -IN ALONG <br />THE BLUFF LINE IF WE WANTED TO. <br />112 <br />MAY 2.3 1979 ROOK 40 PAGE 33® <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.