My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/23/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />E77 <br />COMMISSIONER LOY FELT, IN OTHER WORDS, WE WOULD USE SEVERAL <br />SOURCES TO COME UP WITH THE MONEY NEEDED TO CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IS RIGHT. WHAT IS PAID TO THE <br />CITY WILL BE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE TAXES RAISED FROM THE CITY ON AN <br />AD VALOREM BASIS - SAY COUNTY TAXES ON THE CITY OF VERO BEACH WERE <br />$100 - WE ARE GOING TO TAKE $100 OUT OF THE NON AD VALOREM SOURCE AND <br />PAY THAT TO THE CITY UNDER THE CONTRACT. WE WILL TAX THE PEOPLE IN THE <br />UNINCORPORATED AREAS THE DIFFERENCE BECAUSE THAT WILL BE THE SERVICE <br />THAT SPECIFICALLY BENEFITS THE UNINCORPORATED AREA. THIS IS IN THE <br />KELTON REPORT. THE FORMULA IS FOR WHAT THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE RECEIVED <br />IN AD VALOREM TAXES - THE AD VALOREM TAXES AGAINST CITY RESIDENTS WILL <br />BE REDUCED BY THAT PORTION WE RECEIVED LAST YEAR AND THEN WE WILL GO <br />INTO THE NON AD VALOREM SOURCE AND MAKE THAT UP. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN THE NORTH <br />COUNTY THEY APPROVED 5/10 OF A MILL CAP, WHICH WILL RAISE $68,000, OR <br />WHAT THEY WILL NEED TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN AS PRESENTED BY KELTON & <br />ASSOCIATES. FROM THE NON AD VALOREM TAX REVENUES FROM THE MUNICIPAL <br />SERVICE FUND, A CONTRIBUTION IS GIVEN TO THE NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT <br />OF $68,000, BUT YOU CAN'T GIVE VERO BEACH MORE THAN DOUBLE, OR $136,000, <br />FROM THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND FOR SOUTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION. <br />THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN $136,000 AND $361,000, THEREFORE, WOULD HAVE TO <br />BE RAISED OUT OF A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT FOR.THE--UNINCORPORATED AREA <br />WHICH WOULDN'T PUT THE BURDEN ON THE TAXPAYER OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. <br />YOU HAVE TO HAVE TWO SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY i0 FUND <br />THEIR FIRE PROTECTION. IF WE GIVE THE NORTH COUNTY DISTRICT THE ' <br />$68,000, THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO LEVY ANYTHING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT WE ARE JUST DESIGNATING WHERE AD <br />VALOREM FUNDS ARE GOING. THERE SHOULDN'T BE A TREMENDOUS DIFFERENCE <br />UNDER THIS'PROPOSAL. HE FELT THEY HAVE THE CONCEPT, BUT IT IS CONFUSING <br />AND THEY ARE HAVING TROUBLE COMMUNICATING.IT TO THE BOARD. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED ABOUT PROCEEDING TO SET UP THE MUNICIPAL <br />SERVICE FUND, AND COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT SHE HAD DISCUSSED WITH <br />62 <br />MAY 2 31979 <br />BOOK 40 ?ASE 350 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.