My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/23/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ATTORNEY <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT WE MUST FIND IF THE AGREEMENTS <br />ARE VALID AND ENFORCEABLE. IF THEY ARE, AND WE TAKE ACTION, WE COULD <br />FILE AGAINST THE TOWN TO ENFORCE THE AGREEMENT, BUT HE FELT BEFORE WE <br />DO THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE A UNIFIED SYSTEM. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE QUESTION HAS TO BE RESOLVED AS <br />TO WHETHER WE HAVE AN ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT OR NOT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THEY HAVE DONE QUITE A BIT OF <br />RESEARCH AND EVERYTHING THEY HAVE FOUND INDICATES THE AGREEMENT CAN BE <br />ENFORCED. IT IS A DECISION ON THE COMMISSION'S PART AS TO WHETHER THEY <br />WANT TO DO IT NOW OR IF THEY WISH TO WAIT UNTIL THE DISTRICTS ARE SET UP <br />AND THEN TRY TO WORK OUT THE SOUTH COUNTY PROBLEMS. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER NOW IS THE TIME TO MOVE AHEAD <br />ON THIS MATTER, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE IS A HEARING SET <br />FOR .JUNE 4TH THAT CAN BE CANCELED IF THE BOARD DESIRES. HE ASKED IF THE <br />BOARD WANTS TO GET.OVER THE HURDLE OF THIS PRELIMINARY MOTION OR CANCEL <br />THE HEARING TO SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN. HE NOTED THE MEETING CAN BE SET <br />UP ON 10 DAYS NOTICE AT ANYTIME. <br />THE BOARD FELT THIS IS A LEGAL MATTER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THEM THAT THEY WOULD GET A RULING <br />WITHIN A WEEK, AND IT WILL EITHER BE THAT ATTORNEY CLEM HAS A GOOD CASE <br />FOR THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND WE HAVE TO ANSWER OR THAT IT IS <br />DEFECTIVE. IT IS JUST A MATTER OF WHETHER THE BOARD WANTS TO START THE <br />MOMENTUM GOING. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED THEY WOULD LIKE TO <br />PROCEED THIS FAR, <br />COMMISSIONER LOY REPORTED THAT WE HAVE FOLLOWED UP WITH ONE <br />MORE RECOMMENDATION MADE IN THE.DUAL TAXATION STUDY IN REGARD TO <br />REQUESTING THE SHERIFF TO BREAK HIS BUDGET INTO VARIOUS USES, INVESTI- <br />GATIVE, ADMINISTRATIVE, SERVICES, ETC', SHE CONTINUED THAT FINANCE OFFICER <br />BARTON AND MRS. KHAIL OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ARE NOW WORKING ON A <br />FORMAT TO BREAK THESE FIGURES DOWN, AND THE SHERIFF HAS BEEN VERY WILLING <br />TO COOPERATE. SHE NOTED THAT THIS WILL BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT FORMAT <br />TO WORK WITH AT BUDGET TIME, BUT SHE FEELS IT IS A STEP FORWARD. <br />MAY 23 1979 <br />64 <br />BOOK 40 PAGE 352 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.