My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/03/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
02/03/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:19:04 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2926
Book and Page
126, 459-503
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Inc., and read from written prepared remarks (copy is on file with the backup in the Office <br />of the Clerk to the Board). He applauded the Board’s decision to reexamine the impact fees <br />and Comp Plan and their recognition that something needs to be done soon. He urged them <br />to promptly enact interim development controls on any new rezoning requests, subdivision <br />approvals, or site plan approvals for both single- and multi-family residential developments. <br /> He specified that construction on individual lots held by homeowners should be exempt. It <br />is reasonable to assume that rapid growth will accelerate before other controls can be put in <br />place. He predicted the public would applaud their controls. He listed ten concerns that the <br />visioning process needs to address. He cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld a <br />32-month moratorium in a Lake Tahoe case (535 U.S. 302,337) and urged them to put a <br />moratorium in place immediately. He mentioned that others in the community had called him <br />and wanted to be included as being in support of this request. He mentioned several other <br />homeowner associations that wished to be included in this recommendation. <br />George L. Christopher, <br /> 945 Painted Bunting Lane, advised that his Riomar <br />neighborhood organized approximately two months ago because of their concern for <br />growth in the city and the county. They now have 600 dues-paying members from all over <br />the county; everybody has been calling to express concern. He urged the Board to do this <br />right and then proceed as correctly and as quickly as possible. <br />Chairman Ginn advised she had a list that showed there are 22,291 units somewhere <br />in the “planning world” for our county. She wanted staff to evaluate that list and give the <br />Board an accurate report within the next two weeks of what is on the horizon. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating noted he had received the list from <br />Chairman Ginn the previous day, and, although he had not had an opportunity to study it in <br />detail, he and Planning Division Director Stan Boling saw that some of the developments <br />were double counted; others reflect rezonings where staff looks at the maximum number of <br />lots that could occur and, most of the time, the actual yield is about half that number. Also, <br />February 3, 2004 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.