Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Solari added that he would second the Motion, stressing the idea of <br />working on the Municipalities to see what they could do to participate in sharing the costs of the <br />beach renourishment. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and by a 4-1 <br />vote (Vice Chairman Flescher opposed), the Motion <br />carried. The Board adopted the Sector Boundaries and <br />Beach Management Strategies as presented, with staff to <br />provide a cost benefit analysis for the proposed <br />improvements of additional parking and beach access, and <br />with the directive to encourage all the Municipalities to <br />participate in the funding. <br />The Chairman called a recess at 11:53 a.m., and reconvened the meeting at 12:33 <br />p.m. with all members present. <br />12.J. UTILITIES SERVICES <br />12.J.1. COLLIER CREEK ESTATES PETITION WATER SERVICE, INDIAN RIVER <br />COUNTY PROJECT NO. UCP -401 7 <br />James D. Chastain, Manager of Assessment Projects, presented background and <br />analysis on the request from the owners of Collier Creek Estates for the County to provide <br />potable water and fire protection. He reported that the proposed project was controversial, as 42 <br />owners had signed opposing the Project, while 85 homeowners (representing 63% of the 134 <br />homes) had signed the petition to explore the County water service. He thereafter conveyed that <br />staff was not requesting final approval from the Board, but rather authorization for staff to <br />proceed with the engineering design work. <br />35 <br />February 3, 2009 <br />