Laserfiche WebLink
<br />sections of the county, portable classrooms, population growth, how to track the numbers, benefit <br />to concurrency, how to impose impact fees to pay for the cost of schools, and many others. <br />Mr. Noble Ms. Usher <br />and also responded to questions of several individuals in the <br />audience. <br />Chairman Ginn feels it wise to have school concurrency so it can be addressed. She <br />reminded everyone that all governments have to agree. <br />Mr. Noble <br /> commented he would take this group (with so few municipalities) any time. <br />Chairman Ginn called a brief recess at 2:58 p.m. Meeting was reconvened 3:06 with all <br />participants present at the table. She then introduced the County’s Community Development <br />Director Robert Keating to present the next item, Impact Fees. <br /> <br />III. COUNTYWIDE IMPACT FEES <br />) P <br />ARESENTATION <br /> <br />County Community Development Director Robert Keating gave a PowerPoint presentation <br />(Copy is on file with the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board). He recounted that the <br />Board of County Commissioners had directed staff to begin changing and updating impact fees and <br />listed the proposed impact fees. <br /> <br />B) D <br />ISCUSSION <br /> <br />Discussion ensued amid questions and comments from the table and audience. <br />School Board Assistant Superintendent of Finance Linda Richardson interjected that from <br />the School District’s perspective, they are desirous of looking at impact fees or anything that could <br />bring more revenue. <br />It was noted that the County and municipalities have a lot of policy decisions ahead and <br />school concurrency implementation would be a very intensive process. <br />February 4, 2004 4 <br /> <br />