My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
6/6/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:03:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE ADMINISTRATOR FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD INSTIGATE A COMPLETE <br />DRAINAGE STUDY SOUTH OF ROCKRIDGE AND EAST OF U.S. 1 TO THE INDIAN <br />RIVER SO WE CAN HAVE A TIGHT CONTROL ON WHAT IS BUILT IN THIS AREA <br />BECAUSE EVERY .TIME YOU BUILD A PARKING LOT OR MORE ROOF TOP, YOU <br />ELIMINATE SOME PERCOLATION AREA. HE NOTED, HOWEVER, THAT ALL THIS <br />WILL TAKE BOTH TIME AND MONEY. <br />MR. IIEGENER INQUIRED ABOUT THE 3RD AVENUE BY-PASS, WHICH IS <br />STORM DRAINAGE AND SHOULD BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY. HE FELT.YOU WOULDN'T <br />NEED A PERMIT FOR THIS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NOTED THAT WHEN MR. WEGENER TALKS ABOUT <br />GOING INTO THAT BY-PASS, DIGGING IT OUT, AND ENLARGING IT, HE IS TALKING <br />ABOUT PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND THE COUNTY DOESN'T OWN ONE FOOT OF IT. <br />MR.-'WEGENER FELT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH MIGHT, BUT THE ADMINIS- <br />TRATOR DIDN,T BELIEVE SO. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON WHO IS CAUSING THE PROBLEM - WHY THE <br />DOT HAS NOT CLEANED THE DITCH - CUTTING OFF OF THE OVERFLOW FROM THE <br />SHOPPING CENTER' WHO GAVE�PERMISSION FOR THE PEOPLE TO USE THE DITCH - <br />WHY AN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY WAS NOT DONE, ETC., ETC, IT WAS NOTED THAT <br />THE BOARD CANNOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM THIS AFTERNOON. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT THIS IS A COMPLICATED AND CUM- <br />BERSOME PROBLEM, BUT HE•POINTED OUT THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR IS FAMILIAR <br />WITH WORKING WITH THE MAZE OF AGENCIES AND PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THIS AND <br />` HE FELT THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR HAS MADE A WORTHWHILE SUGGESTION THAT <br />SHOULD BE FOLLOWED. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR`S <br />SUGGESTION SHOULD BE FOLLOWED UP ON AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE SINCE UNTIL <br />WE CAN GET ALL THE PARTIES CONCERNED INVOLVED, NO SOLUTION.CAN BE <br />REACHED. <br />MR. WEGENER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER <br />PROBLEMS MENTIONED, THE DITCH FROM THE PRESENT INDIAN RIVER BLVD. UP <br />TO THE EDGE OF THE RIVER IS VERY SHALLOW AND OVERGROWN. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THE DOT IS AWARE OF <br />THAT. THEY ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO OPEN THAT DITCH TO A CERTAIN POINT, <br />51 <br />JUN 61979 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.