My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/09/2007 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
02/09/2007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 2:48:01 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:11:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop - Concurrency
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/09/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3128
Book and Page
132, 252-271
Subject
U.S. 1 Concurrency
Road Six Lane Widening
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3062
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Wheeler thought one of the things that is very bad for Indian River <br />County is our solution to everything to either 4 -lane, 6 -lane or widen intersections and pumping <br />more and more people into the arteries with less and less connectivity. He was interested in <br />finding a workable solution. <br />Nancy Offutt, Treasure Coast Builders Association, was glad to hear what sounded <br />like an attitude adjustment by the County. She argued that unless we want to use concurrency to <br />stop everything then we have an opportunity to take a more realistic approach to the fact that we <br />are growing but it does not mean we have to change the character of it. Further, if the requirements <br />of concurrency are met then we could take different approaches. She believed high-density living <br />is a choice that people should have if they want to live that way and hoped the Board would look at <br />it as though they are a neighborhood. She urged the Board to "please build the roads" if the <br />alternative is to do nothing. <br />Joseph Paladin, Chairman of the Growth Awareness Committee (a private sector <br />organization) asked how some of these idea changes would affect developers agreements and how <br />we proceed. <br />Commissioner Davis did not see how they could look at a modification of what was <br />planned for on US 1 as far as our transportation needs, without re -addressing the projects that have <br />been approved but not yet built. <br />Mr. Hattaway explained the projects that he has been involved with and how they <br />were dealt with (they leave their current plans in place and set up codes to do things differently). <br />Discussion continued regarding plans for 6-laning certain roads. Director Mora <br />discussed vested trips that are not on the roads yet and felt we have to look at developments that we <br />have already approved. <br />February 9, 2007 10 <br />Public Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.