Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion ensued among Board members and staff about the visioning process and <br />what could be done for our County, the feasibility of allowing CRALLS for five (5) years, and <br />other alternatives to be pursued. <br />Administrator Baird talked about the perception of various entities, which amounts <br />to a lot of the problems we have. He thought it was best for us to continue the way we are going. <br />Mr. Barkett agreed that what Chairman Wheeler said about CRALLS is exactly <br />how it has been used in other jurisdictions. He also felt it was a temporary situation while further <br />plans were being developed and wanted Administrator Baird to add it to the list to bring back for <br />consideration. <br />More discussions ensued regarding whether we could impose CRALLS on just one <br />link and not the entire roadway. <br />It was explained to Vice Chair Bowden that staff was directed to bring this back <br />before the Board for further discussions where Board members could take action. <br />Chairman Wheeler thought it was a good idea to look at these segments of US 1 as <br />communities and see how we could go from one to the other. <br />6. ADJOURNMENT <br />February 9, 2007 17 <br />Public Workshop <br />