Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />913.10 Security for Construction and for Maintenance of <br />Required Improvements.) <br /> <br />Mr. Mechling <br /> questioned the motion and it was read into the record by both <br />Executive Aide Massung and Deputy Clerk Ridgely and further clarified by Commissioner <br />Wheeler. <br />County Attorney Collins commented on the responsibility of landscaping. He called <br />attention to page 307 of the backup (page 5 of the draft ordinance) and suggested it could be <br />clarified pretty easily that: all required improvements, including landscaping, would have to be <br />installed to get a certificate of completion. Then at the bottom of the same page, under <br />Maintenance Security you could scratch out “buffering” improvements and simply handle it <br />through Code Enforcement during the warranty period whether the association is controlled by the <br />developers or the homeowners if the landscaping dies, it could be handled through Code <br />Enforcement and that would address that concern. <br />Commissioner Wheeler commented that sounded reasonable. <br /> <br />9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – CAROLINE D. GINN - <br />REQUEST TO SPEAK REGARDING THE IMPORTANCE OF <br />THE UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Mrs. Ginn’s comments were heard during consideration of Consent Agenda item <br />7.T. above. <br /> <br />9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – DEBORAH ECKER <br />–RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO LDR <br />CHAPTERS 901 - DEFINITIONS AND 926 - LANDSCAPING <br /> <br />March 15, 2005 35 <br /> <br />