My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/17/2009 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
03/17/2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:19:35 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/17/2009
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4026
Book and Page
137, 035-092
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7334
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Keating answered affirmatively and explained why that was being done. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan did not have a problem allowing the point to be paid for <br />the closing cost; but would like to see us delete the option that allows lenders to bump up the <br />mortgage rate. <br />Sheri Reichert, Wells Fargo, explained that the 1 -point option began with Fannie <br />Mae and Freddie Mac changing their pricing structure. She said this was just an avenue to try to <br />expand their current vendors and to encourage more vendors to get involved. Ms. Reichert and <br />Commissioner O'Bryan deliberated the benefits of the point system and interest rate to lender <br />and mortgagee. <br />Rona Saunders, 2408 Newport Drive, Fort Pierce, a member of the Treasure <br />Coast lending consortiums, explained the reason for the changes in the point system, which was <br />proposed to the other lending consortiums, in order to be able to sell the loans. <br />Discussion ensued among Board members and Ms. Reichert regarding the nature <br />of the loans. <br />Commissioner Solari recapped his understanding of the discussions, said it <br />seemed to him that because of the financial implosion of the last 6-9 months, bank regulations <br />have tightened up significantly; their game plan has changed; and basically this 1% was designed <br />more to keep liquidity in the market than it is to add profit margins to the banks. Ms. Reichert <br />affirmed that understanding to be correct. <br />Commissioner Solari said, given that, the result of not adding the 1% would not <br />be to cut the profit margins in banks but to limit the number of loans that would go to these non- <br />profits which would then defeat the purpose of the program. Therefore, he could see why people <br />March 17, 2009 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.