My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/18/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
3/18/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 12:38:45 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2567
Book and Page
125, 121-151
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
491
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bob Johnson, Coral Winds Subdivision, said he supported the previous speakers and <br />thought the addition of the recreation facilities would keep taxpayers from having to pay <br />additional ad valorem taxes in the South County. <br />Cole Sullivan, 2101 151'' Street, Vero Beach, believed if the developers said they were <br />going to build a golf course two years ago, they should follow through with it. He said a golf <br />course would be a very good revenue source for the County. He felt the project should be <br />abandoned if the golf course is being removed. <br />Brian Heady, Vero Beach, said the # 1 revenue source in the State of Florida is tourism and <br />42 is agriculture (citrus). He was opposed to the amendments. He asked if any Commissioner <br />could identify the number of new homes and whether the water available to us today can support <br />that number without increasing sewer systems, fire, police and roads. If the golf course can't <br />be built, he felt the land should revert back to agriculture. <br />Attorney Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd, Vero Beach, representing Knight, McGuire <br />and Associates, argued in defense of the opposing comments and clarified that the Planning & <br />Zoning Commission focused on improvements to the existing plan by increasing open space, <br />preserving uplands, preserving wetlands, and reducing multi -family density through the use of <br />duplexes. <br />Scott McGuire, of Knight, McGuire & Associates, the agent for The Colony Development <br />Associates, LLC, explained the project modifications are proposed improvements to the <br />originally approved Planned Development. These modifications were made through the planned <br />development process. Workshops were held, the planned development ordinance was <br />consulted and the modifications were fine-tuned. He believed the necessary criteria had been <br />met. This planned development preserves natural features on the ground, provides a better <br />impact to wetlands and increases buffers. He did not believe there is a problem with 1.85 units <br />11 <br />MARCH 18, 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.