7/18/1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

T BOOK JUL 181979 41 FAG£ 181 EASEMENT, AND ALSO HAVE GIVEN FREELY AN EASEMENT ON THE EAST SIDE SO THAT IDLEWILD CAN BE DRAINED. ALSO, IT WOULD BE A CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE AND A TIME-CONSUMING SITUATION FOR THEM TO GO BACK, REDO THE PLAT, AND APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD AGAIN. HE EMPHASIZED THAT IT WOULD BE A REAL PROJECT TO HAVE TO MOVE THE UTILITY POLES, AND HE ALSO FELT THAT HAVING A 70' RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE SUBDIVISION WOULD MAKE IT BETTER FROM A CONSERVATION STANDPOINT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE FPL POLES,AND IT WAS DETER- MINED THAT FPL IS ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE PERMISSION OF THE COUNTY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT WHEN WE GET INTO A REAL NEED FOR -MOVING THOSE POLES, THEN THE COUNTY WOULD GO TO FPL AND ASK THAT THEY MOVE THEM. HE CONTINUED THAT HE DIDN'T FEEL THIS SITUATION WOULD HAPPEN TOMORROW, BUT SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE IT MIGHT. HE FURTHER STATED THAT IF THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT ENLARGES THE CANAL AT 12TH STREET, MORE ROAD SHOULDER? WILL BE NEEDED. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT IN LONG-RANGE PLANNING, HE WOULD HAVE TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNER AND THAT IS THE DECISION THAT IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE MADE ON FUTURE PLATS. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE BOARD COULD REQUIRE THE:ADDITIONAL 20' IN THE FORM OF A UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED HE DIDN'T FORESEE PAVEMENT GOING OVER THAT 20' BUT WHEN YOU MOVE THE ROAD, ADEQUATE SPACE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRAINAGE. MR. BEINDORF REPORTED THAT AS A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE, MR. SEXTON SUGGESTED WE COULD USE THE SETBACKS FROM THE EASEMENT LINE IN LIEU OF THE ACREAGE LINE. PLANNER REVER COMMENTED THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THE COUNTY MIGHT WANT TO PUT IN DECELERATION LANES. HIS ALTERNATE SUGGESTION WAS TO SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE AND HAVE A 10' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY AND A 10' EASEMENT THAT WOULD REMAIN WITH THE DEVELOPERS FOR UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE. MR. BEINDORF AGREED AND STATED THAT THE COUNTY WOULD NOT BE PUTTING PAVEMENT IN ON THE LAST 10'.