Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paladin continued his arguments outlining the conditions required by the <br />Planning & Zoning, and whether there was a concurrency certificate issued on the application. <br />Attorney Collins again explained why the County could not ask for the wall to be torn down <br />Mr. Paladin asked if there is anything that could be done to make this acceptable <br />to the people who live there and drive that route (in the vicinity of the wall) rather than get into a <br />legal challenge. <br />Commissioners and staff continued to discuss appropriate landscaping and buffer <br />requirements. <br />Mr. Paladin thought they could incorporate landscaping on both sides of the wall <br />so that the wall would not be so distinguishable. He thought if the Board tried harder, they could <br />resolve the problem. <br />The Board and staff continued to discuss the use and types of canopy trees that <br />could be used for the buffer. <br />There was no action taken on this item. <br />9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - NONE <br />10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS - NONE <br />11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS <br />A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />14 <br />March 18, 2008 <br />