My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/18/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
03/18/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 10:14:15 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4017
Subject
Ocean Concrete
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7232
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to conduct a complete review of the site plan application, and issue final comments within the <br />time specified by the Land Development Regulations (LDRs). <br />Staff contends that it did issue a discrepancy letter within seven (7) working days as required by <br />the LDRs, and that the review followed standard procedures. <br />(2) that staff's denial of the site plan extension was arbitrary and inconsistent with <br />staff's actions during the site plan review and is not based on applicable LDR provisions. <br />Staff contends that its actions were neither arbitrary nor capricious. <br />(3) that staff's denial of the site plan application constitutes a deliberate and bad <br />faith maneuvering to arbitrarily allow the expiration of the site plan application. <br />Staff contends that it has followed all the review timeframe. <br />Director Boling then presented staff's recommendation that the Board find that <br />PZC did not fail to follow the appropriate review standards, and to deny the appeal and uphold <br />P&Z's decision. Staff found that Planning and Zoning did not fail in its review and findings. <br />Director Boling thereafter responded to questions from the Board regarding prior extensions <br />granted, requiring compliance with new LDRs. <br />The Chairman opened the floor to public input. <br />Charles Wilson, 1936 19th Avenue, representing Ocean Concrete, explained the <br />difference between a concrete and a cement plant, and remarked that this site has agreed that it <br />would not create cement. He disclosed that they have a million dollar pollution/dust control <br />provision on the Plant that creates no dust, pollution, manufacturing operations, and no noise. <br />He presented a four -option scenario of how the Board may look at the issue. He thought that if <br />given the opportunity, they could reach a compromise for the best of all the people. <br />Jeffrey Smith, Esquire, Smith & Associates, Tallahassee, representing Ocean <br />Concrete, asked the Board for only one thing, "A fair, honest, straightforward hearing and <br />decision that's free of any kind of posturing, legal gamesmanship, and maneuvering." He <br />18 <br />March 18, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.