My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/18/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
03/18/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 10:14:15 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4017
Subject
Ocean Concrete
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7232
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11.J.3. GRAND HARBOR SPOONBILL MARSH — APPROVAL OF FLORIDA <br />POWER & LIGHT, COMPANY UNDERGROUND FACILITIES <br />INSTALLATION AGREEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF <br />CONSTRUCTION <br />ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Davis, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously approved <br />the Underground Distribution Facilities Installation <br />Agreement with FPL; authorized a Contribution in Aid of <br />Construction in the amount of $52,345.50 ($39,525.20 <br />cash and $12,820.30 in labor); and authorized the <br />Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the <br />memorandum of February 21, 2008. <br />AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />12. COUNTY ATTORNEY <br />A. OCEAN CONCRETE'S APPEAL OF FEBRUARY 22, 2008 DECISION BY <br />THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DETERMINING OCEAN <br />CONCRETE APPEAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF DENIAL <br />OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WAS UNTIMELY DUE TO LATE FILING <br />FEE <br />Jeffrey Smith, Attorney for Ocean Concrete, argued that the appeal was timely <br />filed within Code requirements, and that the $800.00 appeal fee check was included, but was <br />returned for insufficient funds. He argued the point of whether the County should deny an <br />appeal because of a filing fee discrepancy, and suggested to the Board that the question is, not <br />that there is a legal bar, and they can't go forward, but what is good public policy. He <br />acknowledged that they could be denied on the merits, but should not be barred from being <br />heard. <br />30 <br />March 18, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.