Laserfiche WebLink
DO NOT STAY ON YOUR TOES AND THIS CAN RESULT IN LESSER SERVICE. HE <br />FELT THE MOST APPARENT ADVANTAGE IN HAVING MORE THAN ONE COMPANY WORKING <br />WITH THE COUNTY ON THEIR GROWING NEEDS WOULD BE THE COST. HE STATED <br />THAT IF THEY WERE SELECTED TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY, THEY WOULD SUPPLY <br />A COMPARISON OF THEIR PURCHASE PROPOSAL TO THE PREVIOUS ISSUE AND A <br />COMPARISON OF THE DISCOUNT ON THE PREVIOUS ISSUE AND TOTAL EXPENSES. <br />HE NOTED THIS ISSUE IS LARGER AND THE COSTS WILL BE LARGER, BUT HE FELT, <br />PERCENTAGEWISE, THE COST COULD BE REDUCED IN ISSUING THE BONDS. HE <br />NOTED THE TIMING FOR HAVING TWO COMPANIES IS VERY APPROPRIATE BECAUSE <br />THE COUNTY HAS TWO PROGRAMS GOING AT THE SAME TIME - THE HOUSING PROGRAM <br />AND THE RENOVATION PROGRAM. <br />MR. BLAND COMMENTED THAT THE 1977 ISSUE WAS AN ISSUE HOUGH & <br />CO. IS VERY PROUD OF, AND POINTED OUT THAT THEY ACHIEVED AN "A" RATING. <br />HE STATED THAT THEY WOULD BE GLAD TO OPEN UP THEIR RECORDS FOR ANY <br />COMPARISON, BUT POINTED OUT THAT A COMPARISON OF 1977 FIGURES TO 1979 <br />FIGURES WOULD NOT BE VERY VALID. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT INSOFAR AS THE <br />SCHEDULE IS CONCERNED, THEY ARE ATTUNED RIGHT NOW TO GET THIS PARTICULAR <br />BOND ISSUE TO MARKET IN THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF TIME, AND THERE IS A <br />BUILT-IN TIME FACTOR; HE FELT THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE THE MONEY IN HAND <br />IN 75-80 DAYS. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, TO ENGAGE THE FIRM OF WILLIAM R. HOUGH & CO. TO ASSIST AND <br />PREPARE AND WORK WITH THE COUNTY ON BONDS TO FINANCE THE RENOVATION OF <br />THE NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WISHED IT MADE CLEAR THAT HE SECONDED <br />THE MOTION WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS NOT A CLOSED SHOP IN INDIAN <br />RIVER COUNTY. HE DID FEEL THAT IT IS A NECESSITY THAT WE DONT THROW <br />ALL OUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET, BUT STATED THAT HE WILL RELY VERY HEAVILY <br />ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF MR. THOMAS, MR. BARTON AND COMMISSIONER Loy. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON AND COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT IT <br />MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT IT IS NOT A CLOSED SHOP IN THE COUNTY. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />AUG 81979 21 1am 41 Fact264 i <br />