8/8/1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMMISSIONER LOY FELT IT WOULD BE SIMPLER TO HAVE IT ON THE LOT LINE ON THE SOUTH, AND ASKED WHO WOULD DO THE SURVEY AND ESTABLISH THE CORNERS, ATTORNEY THURLOW STATED THAT THE SOUTH LINE HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED BY SURVEY DONE BY CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MR. SCHLITT AGREED THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE THE SURVEY, IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD FELT IT SHOULD BE SPECIFIED THAT THE STRIP WILL BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, AND MR. SCHLITT DID NOT FEEL THIS WOULD BE A PROBLEM, ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO MORTGAGE ON THE 70' STRIP, AND ATTORNEY THURLOW STATED THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO EXCEPT THAT FROM THE MORTGAGE. ASSISTANT PLANNER DAVID MARSH NOTED THAT THEY CAME IN ON THE TAIL END OF THIS MATTER AND ARE PROBABLY NOT AWARE OF ALL THE DISCUSSIONS, BUT HE FELT COMPELLED TO MAKE THE COMMENTS SET OUT IN HIS MEMO OF JULY 6TH AS FOLLOWS: SUBJECT: Vacating Enos Subdivision'Plat DATE; July 6, 1979 All right-of-ways located on the section line should.be retained as this aligns with the proposed 81st Avenue collector on the mainland. Past practice of providing for future roads along section lines should be continued whenever possible. Based on recent correspondence and actions taken by the Board, it would -appear that the 15' strip and the one acre parcel were abandoned as per the recently adopted Resolution No. 79-58, dated June 6, 1979. The staff would recommend' in the future that all existing right-of-ways on section lines which will likely become local streets or collectors be retained. Further, it is felt that any publicly owned parcels which could possibly provide future public beaches should not be vacated or abandoned unless another parcel of like value with comparable ocean frontage access is provided as a suitable alternative. David Marsh Planning Dept. BOOK 41 PAGE 27 1 '