My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/03/2006 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
03/03/2006 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2022 11:59:01 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/2006
Book and Page
130, 301-309
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
290
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />6.Up to 25% of new town project area is allowed to be non-contiguous <br />“sending areas”. Such sending areas will have zero density and will <br />become managed green space. <br /> <br />7.Required percentages of various land uses within new towns, and <br />requirements for affordable and/or workforce housing, are modified to <br />reflect currently accepted planning standards. <br /> <br />8.Requirements for common open space and greenbelt areas are increased <br />and provided with more specificity to reflect currently accepted planning <br />standards. <br /> <br />5. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Bowden said the Board needed to hear the total ramifications of <br />having a “new town.” <br />Staff responded to Commissioner Wheeler’s questions regarding the location for <br />new towns, benefits of having Agriculture Planned Developments (Ag PDs), and density. <br />Discussion ensued by the Commissioners regarding the need for flexibility on <br />policies for Ag PDs. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />George Hamner, <br />member of the Planning and Zoning Commission,spoke in <br />favor of the “new town” concept. He, too, wanted to hear the overall advantages of a “new <br />town”. He felt terms needed to be defined. He was particularly concerned how much space is <br />allocated for commercial services. He liked the idea of all development occurring together, but <br />he thought it needs more review. <br />Joseph Paladin <br />, as a member of the Conservation and Rural Lands Committee, <br />handed out a brief statement defining the overall purpose and objectives of his Committee (copy <br />on file). Also as a member of the Growth Awareness Committee, he mentioned that they want <br />March 3, 2006 <br />3 <br />Public Workshop <br />Proposed New Town Policies <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.